Blake Lively, a renowned actress, is currently embroiled in an ongoing legal dispute regarding allegations of online defamation. The case, connected to the release of her film “It Ends With Us,” centers on lawsuits that could impact her career and public image.
A recent court decision has heightened interest, making this one of the most closely watched celebrity legal cases of the year.
Jurisdiction Hurdles Return
A federal judge in New York has dismissed Lively’s claims against Jed Wallace, a social media consultant from Texas, citing a lack of jurisdiction. This marks the second dismissal on these grounds, raising ongoing questions about where online defamation cases should be tried.
Where It All Started
The dispute began in 2024, when Lively accused Wallace and others of participating in an online campaign around the release of “It Ends With Us.” The lawsuit quickly expanded to include more defendants and claims of reputational harm.
Mounting Legal Pressure
As the case progressed, Lively’s lawyers attempted to hold Wallace accountable in New York, but their efforts were dismissed in July and again in November 2025. The main challenge remains proving that New York courts have jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
Another Dismissal Lands
On November 5, 2025, Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Lively’s claims against Wallace once again, citing a lack of jurisdiction under state law. With part of her lawsuit closed in New York, Lively’s team is weighing whether to pursue claims in another venue.
New York’s Limits Exposed
The Manhattan federal court ruled that it has no power over Wallace, who lives and works in Texas. The decision highlights the challenges in pursuing legal accountability across state lines for online disputes.
What’s at Stake for Lively
A spokesperson for Lively confirmed that she is considering her next steps. With her reputation and professional relationships under scrutiny, the choices she makes could affect her career moving forward. “The Court ruled that Ms. Lively’s claims can and should be brought in a different court,” a spokesperson for Lively said in a statement.
“Ms. Lively is evaluating her many options for doing so, and looks forward to trial on all of her claims against Baldoni, Heath, Nathan and the rest of the Wayfarer defendants in March in New York.”
The Remaining Defendants
Although Wallace is no longer a defendant in New York, others, including director Justin Baldoni and publicist Melissa Nathan, remain part of the case, which is set for trial in March 2026. “We are grateful for the Court’s order today, making clear that the claims against Mr. Wallace never belonged in this court,” said Bryan Freedman, the attorney for Baldoni and the other defendants.
“Allegations that he participated in any smear campaign are unsupported, and all claims against him have been dismissed by this court. The other defendants look forward to their day in court when they will show there is no merit to Ms. Lively’s claims against them.”
A Growing Legal Trend
This legal battle highlights an increasing trend among celebrities to use the courts to address online reputational attacks. However, determining where the alleged harm occurs and assigning accountability remains a top challenge in today’s digital world.
Texas May Be the Next Battlefront
Lively may now pursue her claims against Wallace in Texas, his home state. Notably, Wallace has already filed a countersuit against Lively in Texas, potentially setting up a dramatic legal confrontation.
Tensions Behind the Scenes
Court filings reveal growing tension among Lively’s film team. She alleges Baldoni’s team hired Wallace to run a digital army targeting her online, fueling both public drama and on-set stress.
Changing Legal Strategies
With New York off the table, Lively’s legal team must adapt its strategy. Filing in Texas would require adjusting to local courtroom procedures and state law.
A Possible Comeback
Despite setbacks, Lively’s legal team suggests she is determined to clear her name, possibly through litigation in Texas or another forum.
Experts Offer Perspective
Legal experts note that dismissals for lack of jurisdiction are common in multi-state defamation disputes. They warn that even if the case is refiled in Texas, legal standards vary and success isn’t certain.
What Comes Next
With a March 2026 trial scheduled for the remaining defendants, Lively faces important decisions about refiling in Texas or continuing to focus on New York. Her choices could shape her public image and future career trajectory.
